Seismic Interpretation & Prospect Evaluation
Interpret seismic data to rank drilling prospects with risk-scored trap geometry
What You Can Do
You can decompose seismic interpretation into discrete analysis phases—structural identification, stratigraphic correlation, fault characterization, seal integrity evaluation, and source-to-trap geometry validation. Claude generates ranked prospect summaries with explicit confidence levels tied to seismic data quality, regional analogs, and pressure regime consistency, giving you documented rationale for go/no-go decisions and resource allocation across exploration blocks.
Features
Identify and validate anticlines, domes, and tilted fault blocks with closure dimensions and spill-point analysis
Trace key reflectors across 2D/3D seismic lines to establish trap volume estimates and lateral continuity
Evaluate shale gouge ratio, throw, and dip to quantify fault-seal integrity in tilted blocks and compressional settings
Cross-check structural interpretation against depth conversion, pressure regimes, and known analogs for consistency
Map migration routes from source kitchens to traps and score connectivity risk based on seal quality and overpressure indicators
Generate documented risk profiles (geological, commercial, technical) tied to seismic data resolution and regional play maturity
Produce interpretation summaries with explicit assumptions, uncertainties, and rationale for peer review and investor packages
Example Output
Prospect: Mabrouk Anticline (Block 47, North Africa)
Trap Geometry:
- Structural closure: 180 km² at spill point
- Closure relief: 220 m (crest to spill)
- Trap type: Three-way anticline with western flank dip seal
- Estimated bulk volume: 850 MMbbl (P50)
Fault-Seal Assessment:
- Main bounding fault: ~600 m throw, 35° dip
- Shale gouge ratio: 0.62 (moderate seal quality)
- Risk rating: MEDIUM — fault seal integrity 70% confidence
Charge Pathway:
- Source: Toarcian lacustrine shale, 3.5 km depth
- Migration route: Lateral along Pliensbachian sandstone, up-dip to anticline
- Connectivity confidence: HIGH (85%) — direct contact with trap entry point
Risk Summary:
- Geological risk: 65% (trap geometry and seal verified; source maturity assumed)
- Commercial ranking: TIER 1 — proceed to detailed volumetrics
- Recommended next phase: 3D pressure prediction and DHI analysis
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with interpretation workflow and decision logic:
- Seismic Interpretation Checklist: structural, stratigraphic, and fault assessment criteria
- Prospect Evaluation Template: structured form for trap geometry, seal integrity, charge pathways, and confidence scoring
- Fault-Seal Quantification Framework: shale gouge ratio calculation and interpretation guidelines
- Risk Ranking Matrix: geological, commercial, and technical risk categories with scoring scale
Who It's For
- Exploration geologists — interpreting seismic data to define drilling prospects and manage exploration portfolios
- Basin analysts — assessing play concepts and trap geometries across large acreage packages
- Subsurface teams — ranking competing prospects for well location selection and resource allocation
- Farm-in/farm-out evaluators — documenting interpretation rationale for peer review and investment decisions
- Regional teams — correlating seismic horizons and fault patterns across multiple blocks and license areas
Best For
- 2D/3D seismic dataset interpretation for new exploration blocks or lease rounds
- Prospect definition with mapped structural closures, trap volumes, and risk profiles
- Fault-seal evaluation in tilted fault blocks, compressional regimes, and deepwater settings
- Stratigraphic horizon correlation across multiple seismic lines for trap volume estimation
- Charge pathway mapping and source-to-trap connectivity assessment
You might also like
You can perform comprehensive wellbore hydraulics analysis by inputting well geometry, fluid properties, and operational parameters. Claude calculates pressure drops across open hole and cased hole sections, determines equivalent circulating density (ECD) for narrow margin windows, identifies flow regime transitions, and provides optimization recommendations that balance ROP, hole cleaning, and well control margins. This enables you to validate designs, troubleshoot pressure anomalies, and make data-driven adjustments to flow rates and drilling fluid specifications before issues impact operations.
by delphine-l
You can conduct systematic hazard identification across operational zones, quantify exposure severity using evidence-based risk matrices, and develop hierarchical control strategies with realistic implementation timelines. This skill helps you document defensible assessments that satisfy regulatory requirements (OSHA, API, IMCA) and support informed decision-making for health protection measures.
by delphine-l
You can systematically interpret seismic horizons, define trap geometries, analyze fault-seal integrity, and evaluate hydrocarbon systems risk. The skill helps you translate complex seismic data into documented prospect definitions with depth-converted volumes, cross-validate interpretation scenarios against well-seismic ties, and build risk-weighted volumetric estimates to support drilling decisions and portfolio prioritization.
You can analyze geochemical analytical data to characterize petroleum source rocks and quantify their hydrocarbon generation potential. This skill guides you through interpreting Rock-Eval pyrolysis parameters (S1, S2, S3, Tmax), assessing thermal maturity using vitrinite reflectance and Tmax correlations, classifying kerogen types (I-IV), calculating transformation ratios, and evaluating depositional environments to construct petroleum systems models and manage exploration risk.
by delphine-l
You can systematically interpret sedimentary facies from core descriptions, wireline logs, and outcrop data to build coherent paleoenvironmental models. This skill helps you classify lithofacies and ichnofacies, recognize recurring depositional patterns, correlate stratigraphic intervals across multiple wells, and predict reservoir quality and geometry based on depositional systems. You'll move beyond simple lithologic logging to derive interpretations that directly support exploration risking, play fairway mapping, and field development planning.
by delphine-l
You can systematically analyze formation pressure measurements, buildup/drawdown test data, and long-term monitoring records to diagnose underlying reservoir behavior. This skill helps you identify depletion trends, detect faulting or sealing boundaries, quantify aquifer support, track fluid contact movement, and reveal wellbore communication patterns—transforming raw pressure data into strategic guidance for drilling locations, completion design, and production operations.
by delphine-l
You can analyze pressure buildup and drawdown test data to identify flow regimes, apply type curve matching techniques to estimate reservoir properties, and conduct material balance studies to quantify original oil/gas in place (OOIP/OGIP). Claude helps you evaluate pressure support mechanisms, generate production forecasts under different depletion scenarios, and assess reserve uncertainty from pressure interpretation data.
by delphine-l
You can rapidly synthesize core descriptions, wireline log responses, grain size trends, and sedimentary structure patterns into reproducible facies assignments and paleoenvironmental interpretations. The skill eliminates manual narrative synthesis bias by guiding you through a structured framework that flags ambiguities, supports cross-well correlation, and generates stratigraphic context for play characterization and field development decisions.
by delphine-l