Investment Due Diligence Analyzer
Analyze investment opportunities with systematic financial due diligence and risk frameworks
What You Can Do
You'll systematically evaluate investment targets by uploading financial statements and deal documents, then Claude extracts financial assumptions, identifies inconsistencies and red flags, models valuation scenarios with sensitivity analysis, and synthesizes findings into clear decision frameworks. Instead of manually building analysis from scratch, you get a repeatable system that validates assumptions, challenges seller narratives, and flags risks before they reach your investment committee.
Features
Automatically pulls key metrics from P&L, balance sheets, and cash flow statements, then questions underlying assumptions and identifies inconsistencies
Detects anomalies like unusual revenue concentration, margin compression, customer churn patterns, and accounting treatments that warrant deeper investigation
Builds base case, bull case, and bear case valuations with sensitivity analysis on key drivers (EBITDA multiple, growth rate, discount rate)
Structures financial, operational, commercial, and legal risks into a standardized framework for consistent evaluation across deals
Analyzes earn-out mechanics, clawback provisions, seller financing, and working capital adjustments to model true economics
Cross-references seller claims against industry benchmarks, historical performance, and peer comparables to validate or challenge key inputs
Synthesizes analysis into a decision-ready summary with key risks, valuation range, and clear recommendation language
Example Output
Example 1: Financial Red Flag Detection Input: SaaS company P&L showing 40% revenue growth but declining gross margins
Output:
- Red Flag: Gross margin compression from 72% to 68% despite scale
- Possible Causes: (1) Price competition in new segments, (2) Mix shift to lower-margin products, (3) Increased CAC/implementation costs
- Validation Needed: Customer acquisition cost trend, net retention by cohort, pricing changes YoY
- Impact on Valuation: If margin compression continues, 10% discount to base case DCF
Example 2: Valuation Sensitivity Analysis Input: Target valued at 8x EBITDA ($50M), seller claims 25% growth
Output:
Valuation Bridge Analysis:
- Base Case: 7x EBITDA × $8.2M = $57.4M (assumes 18% growth, margin stabilization)
- Bull Case: 9x EBITDA × $9.1M = $81.9M (25% growth, 100bps margin improvement)
- Bear Case: 5x EBITDA × $7.2M = $36M (10% growth, 200bps margin compression)
Sensitivity: $1M change in EBITDA = $7-9M valuation impact
Conclusion: 8x asking price is 14% above base case; negotiable at 7x
What's Included
- SKILL.md: Complete due diligence analyzer system prompt and methodology
- Financial Statement Analysis Template: Checklist for extracting and validating P&L, balance sheet, and cash flow metrics
- Red Flag Assessment Framework: Structured checklist covering financial, operational, and commercial risk categories
- Valuation Modeling Workbook: DCF and multiple-based valuation templates with sensitivity tables
- Investment Committee Memo Template: Executive summary format for presenting findings and recommendations
Who It's For
- Corporate Development Managers — Leading M&A and investment evaluation processes
- Investment Committee Members — Reviewing deal analysis and making capital allocation decisions
- Private Equity Associates — Conducting initial due diligence on potential platform or add-on acquisitions
- Strategic Finance Teams — Supporting business unit leadership evaluating minority investments or partnerships
- Growth Equity Analysts — Screening early-stage or scaling investment opportunities
Best For
- M&A deal screening and initial due diligence on acquisition targets
- Financial statement analysis and red flag identification in investment documents
- Valuation validation and multi-scenario sensitivity modeling
- Deal structure evaluation and true economics modeling
- Investment committee decision memo preparation and risk summarization
You might also like
You can convert deal documents, organizational assessments, and business objectives into detailed integration playbooks that map critical dependencies, flag integration risks before they materialize, quantify cost and revenue synergies tied to specific milestones, and create cross-functional roadmaps that compress planning cycles from weeks to days. This skill identifies hidden complexities that typically delay deals and ensures your 100-day priorities are achievable and stakeholder-aligned.
by jrmarcello
You can rapidly parse statutory language to identify interpretation issues, ambiguities, and conflicts between provisions. The skill maps cross-references, extracts hierarchical structures, and organizes findings into research memos and analysis briefs. It surfaces definitional inconsistencies and helps you see how provisions interact across the statute.
by jrmarcello
You can rapidly generate formally structured legal opinion letters that articulate legal assessments, conclusions, and recommendations. Simply provide the legal issue, key facts, jurisdiction, and client concerns, and the skill produces a polished, client-ready letter for delivery or refinement. You focus entirely on the legal analysis while the skill handles technical formatting and structure.
by jrmarcello
You can build complete strategic plans that move beyond static annual exercises to dynamic, data-driven strategies. The skill guides you through situational assessment, objective-setting, scenario modeling, initiative development, and implementation roadmapping—all structured for executive presentation and organizational alignment. You'll produce defensible plans with validated assumptions, clear ownership, milestone tracking, and contingency scenarios.
by jrmarcello
You can create objective evaluation matrices that compare 2-8 vendor candidates across weighted criteria, score performance systematically, identify hidden risks and deal-breakers, and generate detailed selection reports with clear rationale. This skill lets you quantify intangible factors like reliability and support responsiveness, calculate total cost of ownership, and produce documentation that justifies your selection decision to stakeholders and audit requirements.
by jrmarcello
You can submit any contract clause and receive a systematic risk assessment, legal consistency review, and alternative negotiation language. The skill evaluates clauses against standard legal principles, flags problematic language, cross-references related clauses for conflicts, and generates compliant alternatives that protect your interests while maintaining enforceability and market competitiveness.
by jrmarcello
You can conduct rigorous, bias-free supplier evaluations by inputting candidate information, establishing weighted evaluation criteria, analyzing total cost of ownership (TCO), and identifying operational and financial risks. The skill produces a ranked comparison with clear scoring justification, risk flags, and a documented recommendation that stakeholders can approve with confidence.
by jrmarcello
Feed Claude your process data—cycle times, wait times, handoffs, inventory points—and receive structured waste categorization mapped to the eight forms of muda, current-state bottleneck analysis with quantified impact, future-state process design with specific kaizen opportunities, and improvement prioritization using financial and implementation metrics. This skill consolidates fragmented process data from spreadsheets, interviews, and logs into a cohesive analysis, eliminating manual VSM work while surfacing hidden inefficiencies you'd otherwise miss.
by jrmarcello