Clinical Decision Support
Generate publication-ready clinical decision support documents with biomarker analyses and GRADE ...
What You Can Do
You can generate publication-ready clinical decision support documents that synthesize complex clinical evidence into actionable recommendations. This skill produces biomarker-stratified patient cohort analyses with statistical outcome comparisons, and treatment recommendation reports featuring GRADE evidence grading, decision algorithms, and regulatory-compliant formatting. Documents are optimized for pharmaceutical research, clinical guidelines, and regulatory submissions.
Features
segment patient populations by molecular subtypes, gene expression, or immunohistochemistry markers with comparative outcomes
systematically classify evidence quality and recommendation strength across treatment options
generate hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots, and comparative efficacy data with proper statistical notation
develop decision trees and clinical pathways based on patient characteristics and evidence hierarchy
automatically format documents meeting pharmaceutical journal and regulatory submission standards
consolidate clinical trial data, real-world evidence, and guideline recommendations into structured reports
ensure documents meet ICH, FDA, and EMA standards for clinical documentation
Example Output
Example 1: Biomarker-Stratified Cohort Analysis
| Patient Subgroup | N | Median OS (months) | Hazard Ratio | GRADE Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PD-L1 High (≥50%) | 145 | 24.3 | 0.61 (0.48-0.78) | Moderate |
| PD-L1 Low (<50%) | 89 | 18.1 | 0.89 (0.65-1.21) | Low |
Example 2: Treatment Recommendation Report
Recommendation 1 (GRADE: Strong, Moderate quality evidence): First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy for PD-L1 high patients based on randomized controlled trial data (RCT n=234, HR=0.61).
Recommendation 2 (GRADE: Conditional, Low quality evidence): Consider combination chemotherapy for PD-L1 low patients given limited immunotherapy benefit and supporting observational data.
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with clinical decision support protocols and document templates:
- Biomarker stratification framework: molecular subtype classification and cohort definition templates
- GRADE evidence grading checklist: systematic approach to rating evidence quality and recommendation strength
- Statistical outcomes template: standardized format for hazard ratios, survival analysis, and comparative efficacy reporting
- Treatment recommendation algorithm template: decision tree structure for evidence-based clinical pathways
- LaTeX/PDF formatting styles: publication-ready templates compliant with pharmaceutical journal standards
Who It's For
- Clinical researchers and drug development teams synthesizing evidence for pharmaceutical compounds
- Medical directors and evidence committees developing institutional clinical guidelines
- Regulatory affairs professionals preparing clinical evidence dossiers for submissions
- Biostatisticians and epidemiologists creating comparative effectiveness analyses
- Medical writers developing clinical decision support materials for healthcare organizations
Best For
- Generating biomarker-driven patient stratification analyses for precision medicine studies
- Creating GRADE-based treatment recommendation reports for clinical guidelines
- Synthesizing multi-trial evidence into structured comparative effectiveness documents
- Developing regulatory-compliant clinical decision support for drug approval submissions
- Building evidence-based clinical algorithms and decision pathways for treatment selection
You might also like
You conduct comprehensive pre-operative risk stratification using ASA classification, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), and procedure-specific risk tools to quantify operative risk across physiologic systems. You systematically identify modifiable risk factors—anemia, hypertension, glucose dyscontrol, cardiac dysfunction—and implement targeted optimization protocols to reduce preventable complications. You generate objective, evidence-backed assessments that strengthen informed consent discussions, support case selection decisions, and create defensible documentation for shared decision-making with patients and surgical teams.
by gptomics
You'll systematically evaluate patient risk factors, stratify perioperative risk using evidence-based frameworks, and generate detailed anesthesia plans that address specific comorbidities and procedural requirements. This skill helps you synthesize complex patient data—medical history, physical exam findings, lab work, imaging, and medication profiles—into actionable risk mitigation strategies that optimize patient safety and guide technique selection, drug choices, and monitoring protocols.
by gptomics
You can rapidly develop theoretically-grounded case formulations that integrate diagnostic findings, historical context, and clinical observations into a coherent narrative. The skill systematizes your conceptualization across multiple therapeutic modalities (CBT, psychodynamic, trauma-informed, systemic) and generates structured treatment plans with specific goals, interventions, and prognostic considerations—ideal for supervision presentations, case conferences, documentation, and complex diagnostic scenarios.
by gptomics
You can systematically document refraction findings for low vision patients and generate prescriptions optimized for specific functional tasks like reading, mobility, and facial recognition. The skill calculates appropriate magnification ratios, predicts realistic visual outcomes, and creates comprehensive documentation that prioritizes quality of life over distance acuity—transforming conventional refraction into patient-centered, task-driven prescriptions.
by gptomics
You can rapidly analyze multifaceted surgical presentations—including revision cases, comorbidities, and combined pathology—to develop defensible pre-operative plans and detailed operative notes. The skill synthesizes clinical findings with imaging data, stratifies surgical risk, selects technique-specific approaches, and produces documentation that withstands peer review and quality audits.
by gptomics
You structure clinical research manuscripts according to IMRaD (Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion) standards required by peer-reviewed journals. This skill helps you draft sections from raw research notes, polish prose for academic clarity, enforce citation standards, and identify common submission issues before sending to journals. The result is a manuscript ready for peer review with minimal editor feedback.
by hah23255
You can perform structured sports injury evaluations that incorporate mechanism-of-injury analysis, orthopedic special testing, functional movement screening, and clear referral criteria. The skill helps you differentiate soft tissue restrictions from joint dysfunctions, establish baseline function, and create evidence-based return-to-play milestones tailored to the athlete's sport and position. You'll generate documentation suitable for insurance records, team physician communication, and liability protection.
by gptomics
You can systematically generate ranked differential diagnoses for presenting complaints (chest pain, dyspnea, abdominal pain, headache, joint pain, fatigue) by applying evidence-based clinical decision rules and risk stratification. The skill helps you identify red flags that change management priority, justify test selection to supervising physicians, and document diagnostic reasoning in the medical record while reducing anchoring bias and ensuring comprehensive consideration of serious diagnoses.
by gptomics