AML/KYC Regulatory Framework Analyzer
Map FATF, FinCEN, and FCA guidance into jurisdiction-specific AML/KYC compliance frameworks
What You Can Do
You can systematically convert abstract regulatory guidance from FATF, FinCEN, FCA, and regional authorities into concrete operational procedures mapped to your specific jurisdiction and customer profile. The skill extracts overlapping requirements, identifies contradictions between frameworks, and generates risk-weighted compliance matrices that prevent both dangerous gaps and wasteful over-compliance. You'll produce documentation showing exactly which procedures satisfy which regulatory obligations—essential for examinations and audit defense.
Features
Automatically identify and cross-reference AML/KYC obligations from FATF Recommendations, FinCEN guidance, FCA rules, and regional regulations
Create compliance matrices showing which requirements apply to your operating jurisdictions and customer segments
Compare current operational procedures against regulatory expectations to surface compliance deficiencies
Generate documentation linking each compliance procedure directly to the specific regulatory obligation it satisfies
Develop tiered KYC/AML procedures based on regulatory sophistication levels and customer risk profiles
Design monitoring thresholds and scenarios that satisfy regulatory standards while remaining operationally feasible
Identify conflicting requirements across jurisdictions and propose harmonized compliance approaches
Evaluate your current program against multi-jurisdictional standards before regulatory examination
Example Output
Input: FinCEN's new crypto-asset rule guidance document + your current KYC questionnaire
Output:
JURISDICTION: United States (FinCEN Guidance 2024)
CUSTOMER SEGMENT: Institutional Crypto Traders
REQUIREMENT: Enhanced Due Diligence for High-Risk Jurisdictions
→ Regulatory Source: FinCEN Guidance §312(b)(1)
→ Your Procedure: Mandatory OFAC screening + beneficial ownership verification for entities in FATF Grey List countries
→ Implementation Gap: Current system flags only Specially Designated Nationals; missing beneficial owner jurisdiction check
→ Compliance Action: Enhance KYC questionnaire with beneficial owner residency field; update screening logic
Input: Multi-jurisdiction operating scope (US, EU, Singapore)
Output: Compliance matrix showing:
- 15 core AML/KYC requirements
- Jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction applicability (✓ Required / ○ Best Practice / ✗ Not Applicable)
- Risk rating for each jurisdiction
- Recommended KYC tier thresholds by region
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file: Core prompting framework for regulatory analysis and mapping
- AML/KYC Requirement Extraction Template: Structured format for cataloging regulatory obligations from any guidance document
- Jurisdiction Compliance Matrix Template: Pre-built spreadsheet structure showing requirement applicability across regions
- Procedure-to-Requirement Traceability Checklist: Audit-ready documentation linking procedures to regulatory sources
- Risk-Weighted KYC Tier Framework: Customer segmentation and due diligence scaling based on regulatory risk levels
- Gap Analysis Worksheet: Systematic comparison of current practices against extracted regulatory standards
Who It's For
- Crypto Compliance Officers — Building or updating AML/KYC programs across multiple jurisdictions
- Compliance Operations Managers — Translating regulatory guidance into operational procedures and monitoring rules
- Crypto Exchange & Wallet Service Operators — Documenting compliance frameworks for licensing and regulatory examination
- Fintech Legal & Compliance Teams — Assessing regulatory impact and updating procedures for new guidance
- Risk & Governance Leads — Conducting compliance readiness assessments before regulatory audits
Best For
- Responding to new regulatory guidance (FinCEN rules, EU crypto-asset regulations, state licensing requirements)
- Building or updating jurisdiction-specific KYC/AML procedures from regulatory source documents
- Preparing compliance documentation for regulatory examination or licensing application
- Designing transaction monitoring rules that satisfy regulatory thresholds and patterns
- Harmonizing compliance procedures across multiple jurisdictions with overlapping or conflicting requirements
You might also like
You can conduct comprehensive risk assessments across three domains—technical security (smart contract vulnerabilities, oracle dependencies, upgrade mechanisms), economic design (tokenomics sustainability, incentive alignment, liquidation mechanics), and market positioning (liquidity depth, slippage exposure, regulatory headwinds, competitive landscape). The framework helps you produce stakeholder-ready risk matrices and spot design flaws in 1-2 hours instead of days, enabling faster and more confident protocol evaluation decisions.
by avvale
You can architect incentive mechanisms by mapping behavioral outcomes to economic parameters, simulating how different user cohorts respond to reward changes, and identifying misalignment vectors before deployment. This skill combines game theory, behavioral economics, and mechanism design to help you stress-test incentive structures against market scenarios and validate that your reward distribution drives desired behaviors without enabling Sybil attacks, mercenary farming, or protocol-damaging exploitation.
by avvale
You can design tailored vesting structures for founders, employees, advisors, investors, and community members—complete with cumulative release curves, price impact analysis, and tier-specific unlock mechanics. Claude helps you model supply-side pressure across quarters and years, optimize cliff periods and vesting durations to minimize dump risk while maintaining market liquidity, and create compliant schedules that satisfy investment agreements and regulatory frameworks.
by avvale
You can conduct comprehensive audits of governance mechanisms across three critical dimensions: security (vote concentration, quorum thresholds, timelock periods), participation incentives (delegation models, reward structures, voter alignment), and operational sustainability (decision-making efficiency, vesting schedules, progressive decentralization timelines). Claude identifies conflicts between competing governance objectives, stress-tests designs against known attacks (whale voting, voter apathy, bribery vectors), and delivers specific mitigation recommendations with implementation guidance.
by avvale
You can perform comprehensive economic audits of blockchain-based games by analyzing tokenomics structures, reward mechanics, and long-term sustainability indicators. The skill helps you model the impact of new features on economic health, benchmark against competitor economies, and design reward schedules that balance player acquisition, retention, and monetization without creating pay-to-win perception or unsustainable inflation.
by avvale
You can design and validate complete tokenomic systems by modeling supply allocation, emission schedules, vesting timelines, and incentive structures. The framework helps you stress-test your token economics against bear markets and extreme usage scenarios, identify circular dependencies or perverse incentives, and compare competing tokenomic designs to ensure sustainable alignment of stakeholder interests with protocol health.
by avvale
You can evaluate existing DAO voting systems for vulnerabilities, design new voting mechanisms from first principles, and stress-test governance scenarios to identify systemic risks. The skill analyzes voter participation patterns, quorum requirements, voting power distribution models, and incentive structures to ensure your governance framework resists attacks, prevents plutocracy, and maintains meaningful participation.
by avvale
You can design complete governance architectures that balance decentralization with operational efficiency while protecting protocol integrity. This skill enables you to evaluate governance trade-offs, model participation scenarios, create voting mechanisms tied to economic incentives, and validate frameworks against common attack vectors like voter apathy, whale domination, and governance capture before mainnet deployment.
by avvale