Public Librarian Research Guidance & Consultation Skill
Guide patrons through expert research strategies and information literacy
What You Can Do
Provide comprehensive research guidance to library patrons by creating customized search strategies, evaluating information sources, and developing literacy materials. You can conduct consultations, design reference guides, and help patrons navigate complex research questions across any subject area.
Features
Create tailored research plans for patron inquiries, identifying the best databases, sources, and search approaches for their specific information needs
Generate criteria and checklists to help patrons assess source credibility, authority, and relevance using CRAAP test and similar evaluation methods
Design lesson plans, handouts, and interactive materials for teaching patrons how to search effectively, cite properly, and think critically about information
Generate clarifying questions and conversation templates to help you conduct effective reference interviews and uncover patron's true information need
Create style guides and citation examples for MLA, APA, Chicago, and other formats tailored to specific patron needs and disciplines
Suggest the most appropriate library databases, websites, and resources based on subject, format, and patron skill level
Help patrons transform vague topics into focused research questions with clear scope, keywords, and research objectives
Create curated collections of guides, FAQs, and resource lists organized by popular research topics and patron demographics
Example Output
Research Strategy for "Climate Change and Urban Agriculture"
Recommended Approach:
- Start with scholarly databases: JSTOR, ProQuest Environmental Index
- Add practitioner sources: GreenBuild Magazine, Urban Land Institute reports
- Search terms: "urban agriculture" AND (climate OR sustainability)
Sources to Evaluate:
- Peer-reviewed journals ✓ High credibility
- Government reports ✓ Authoritative data
- Blog posts ✗ Verify against primary sources
Information Literacy Handout
How to Spot Reliable Information (3-minute patron guide)
CRAAP Test:
- Currency: When was it published?
- Relevance: Does it match your research question?
- Authority: Who's the author? What are their credentials?
- Accuracy: Can you verify facts with other sources?
- Purpose: Is the source trying to sell something?
Print and laminate for reference desk distribution.
What's Included
- Reference Interview Templates: Pre-built conversation starters and question sets for conducting effective patron interviews
- Source Evaluation Checklists: Printable guides and frameworks for teaching patrons to assess credibility and relevance
- Database Matching Tool: Quick reference guide correlating research topics with your library's subscription databases
- Citation Style Guides: Customizable handouts for MLA, APA, Chicago, and other citation formats with patron-friendly examples
- Information Literacy Curriculum Outlines: Lesson plans and activity ideas for teaching research skills to different age groups and skill levels
Who It's For
- Public Librarians
- Reference Librarians
- Information Literacy Instructors
- Library Branch Managers
- Community Outreach Coordinators
Best For
- Conducting patron reference consultations
- Creating research guides and handouts
- Developing information literacy programs
- Teaching source evaluation skills
- Building citation instruction materials
You might also like
Design comprehensive brand identity systems from scratch, including logos in 55+ styles, corporate identity programs with 50+ deliverables, design tokens and UI styling frameworks, professional banners in 22+ styles, custom SVG icons, and optimized social media assets across 8+ platforms. Claude generates production-ready files with mockups, specifications, and platform-specific formatting for immediate use.
This skill analyzes grant requirements, interprets funder regulations, and coordinates compliance workflows for research institutions. You'll receive structured compliance guidance, multi-funder requirement synthesis, deadline tracking, and risk assessments that help you navigate complex sponsored research administration with confidence.
You can manage the complete subcontract lifecycle—from initial negotiation through execution, compliance monitoring, and closure—with built-in risk analysis and automated documentation. The skill verifies compliance requirements, identifies contractual risks, generates required documentation, and tracks key milestones and renewal dates. All workflows are customizable to your organization's procurement policies and risk tolerance.
This skill helps you manage sponsored research compliance requirements, generate required documentation, and track regulatory obligations. You can create compliance checklists, audit existing documentation against funder requirements, generate compliance reports, and maintain organized records of all sponsored program activities.
This skill helps you create standardized metadata schemas, auto-document datasets with rich descriptions, and generate structured data dictionaries that make your datasets discoverable and reusable. You can transform unorganized data into professionally documented datasets with consistent naming conventions, data lineage tracking, and compliance-ready documentation.
Coordinate systematic literature reviews using PRISMA 2020 frameworks and PICO methodology to streamline evidence synthesis. You get structured workflows for study selection, quality appraisal, and risk of bias assessment—all designed to meet academic publishing standards and accelerate your review timeline.
You can conduct comprehensive, systematic compliance audits for grants and contracts by analyzing documents against regulatory requirements, categorizing risks by severity, and documenting findings with supporting evidence. The skill generates detailed audit reports, regulatory gap analyses, and remediation roadmaps tailored to your specific compliance framework (FAR, OMB circulars, funder requirements, etc.). It accelerates audit cycles by automating finding documentation, comparative compliance mapping, and risk prioritization.
You submit your research consent form and receive a systematic compliance review against 45 CFR 46 and 21 CFR 56 regulations. The skill identifies specific deficiencies, maps each gap to regulatory requirements, and generates institution-specific remediation guidance with reference language you can use to bring your form into compliance.