HEOR Evidence Synthesis & Dossier Builder
Synthesize health economic evidence into payer-ready regulatory dossiers
What You Can Do
You can rapidly compile, organize, and format disparate health economic evidence—from clinical trials to cost-effectiveness analyses—into structured, regulatory-compliant dossiers. This skill maps your evidence to specific payer and HTA requirements, automatically generates evidence hierarchies, and produces submission-ready dossier outlines with formatting that meets regulatory standards for NICE, EUnetHTA, and other major bodies.
Features
Automatically organize and structure clinical, economic, and safety evidence from multiple sources into a coherent hierarchy.
Align evidence to specific payer requirements (NICE, EUnetHTA, PBAC, etc.) and flag gaps before submission.
Structure cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), cost-utility analysis (CUA), and budget impact analysis (BIA) documentation.
Generate pre-formatted dossier outlines and section hierarchies matching regulatory submission standards.
Evaluate the quality and robustness of included evidence using validated hierarchies (GRADE, Cochrane, etc.).
Organize and format citations in regulatory-preferred styles; detect missing bibliographic data.
Identify missing evidence, highlight weak links in your economic model, and suggest data collection priorities.
Maintain dossier versions and auto-generate change summaries for iterative submissions.
Example Output
Example 1: Evidence Organization Table
| Evidence Type | Source | Quality (GRADE) | Key Finding | Regulatory Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pivotal RCT | Smith et al. 2023 | High | 35% mortality reduction vs. placebo | Primary efficacy |
| Economic Model | Internal CEA | Moderate | €42,500/QALY vs. standard care | Cost-effectiveness claim |
| Real-world data | Claims database | Moderate | 18% hospitalization reduction | Effectiveness support |
Example 2: NICE-Compliant Dossier Structure
A. Executive Summary | B. Clinical Effectiveness | B.1 Disease background and epidemiology | B.2 Clinical evidence summary | C. Health Economic Model | C.1 Model structure and justification | C.2 Cost-effectiveness results | D. Budget Impact Analysis | E. Discussion
Example 3: Gap Analysis Report
- ✅ Robust pivotal efficacy data (Phase III RCT, n=450)
- ⚠️ Limited long-term safety data (max 12-month follow-up)
- ❌ Missing real-world effectiveness in elderly subgroup
- 💡 Recommendation: Post-approval registry to address age-specific outcomes
What's Included
- Evidence synthesis templates: Pre-built frameworks for organizing clinical trials, observational studies, economic analyses, and safety data.
- Regulatory dossier blueprints: Section-by-section outlines and formatting guides for NICE, EUnetHTA, PBAC, ICER, and other major payer/HTA bodies.
- Health economic model organizer: Structure for documenting CEA/CUA inputs, assumptions, model architecture, and sensitivity analyses.
- Compliance checker: Automated review to ensure evidence meets payer-specific requirements (e.g., trial minimum size, clinical thresholds).
- Evidence quality rubric: GRADE, Cochrane risk-of-bias, and custom scales to rate and categorize evidence strength.
- Regulatory requirement matrix: Cross-reference table mapping your evidence to NICE, EUnetHTA, and other payer submission criteria.
Who It's For
- Health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) analysts
- Regulatory affairs and submissions specialists
- Medical affairs and reimbursement teams
- Payer strategy and health technology assessment managers
- Pharmaceutical and medical device R&D teams preparing submissions
Best For
- Preparing regulatory dossiers for EMA, NICE, and EUnetHTA submissions
- Synthesizing clinical and economic evidence into coherent arguments
- Structuring health economic models (CEA, CUA, BIA) for payer review
- Organizing evidence hierarchies and gap analysis for reimbursement applications
- Building rapid health technology assessment (HTA) dossiers
You might also like
This skill guides you through rigorous experiment design from hypothesis to analysis plan. You'll compute the statistical power needed for your tests, identify confounding variables to control for, design optimal randomization strategies, and generate pre-registered analysis plans that prevent p-hacking and publication bias. Whether you're running a product A/B test or investigating causal effects in observational data, you get structured, validated designs that account for real-world constraints.
by moonwell-fi
You can build production-grade vector search systems that retrieve semantically similar documents in sub-millisecond time using AgentDB's optimized HNSW indexing. The skill enables you to implement RAG pipelines, semantic search engines, and intelligent knowledge bases with configurable embedding dimensions, distance metrics (cosine, Euclidean, dot product), and similarity thresholds—all with built-in quantization and caching for massive performance gains.
by moonwell-fi
This skill transforms high-level feature requests into actionable implementation plans by conducting deep requirement interviews, analyzing existing codebases (or planning greenfield projects), and producing comprehensive handoff documents. It distinguishes between brownfield development (with existing code to integrate) and greenfield projects (starting from scratch), ensuring your technical strategy accounts for your actual constraints and patterns.
by moonwell-fi
Diagnose root causes of model performance failures, select optimal evaluation metrics based on your use case and data characteristics, and design comprehensive evaluation strategies. You'll get systematic workflows for analyzing failure modes, statistical significance testing, threshold optimization, and cross-validation planning—turning vague model problems into actionable fixes.
by moonwell-fi
This skill helps you systematically diagnose failures in distributed ML training and serving infrastructure. You provide system logs, metrics, and error traces, and Claude performs structured root-cause analysis to identify the underlying issue—whether it's resource exhaustion, distributed system deadlock, data pipeline corruption, or model serving misconfiguration. You get a detailed diagnosis with remediation steps ranked by likelihood and implementation effort.
by moonwell-fi
Systematically evaluate your Claude prompts using quantitative scoring frameworks to identify weaknesses in clarity, task alignment, and output quality. You'll receive detailed optimization recommendations with A/B testing guidance to improve prompt effectiveness and consistency across different use cases and input variations.
by moonwell-fi
You can systematically diagnose why your RAG system isn't returning relevant results and identify specific misalignments between queries and context. This skill walks you through analyzing retrieval quality, scoring context relevance, and optimizing prompt-retrieval alignment to improve your RAG accuracy. You'll get concrete, actionable recommendations for fixing bottlenecks in your pipeline.
by moonwell-fi
You can confidently navigate complex statistical analyses by working through structured workflows that match your research question and data type to the right test. The skill guides you through assumption validation, helps you interpret results accurately without common pitfalls, and walks you through regression diagnostics with full transparency about what your findings actually mean.
by moonwell-fi