Podiatric Surgical Case Planning & Decision Support
Structured surgical planning and complication prevention for foot and ankle cases
What You Can Do
You can input patient presentation, imaging, and clinical findings to receive a structured case analysis that compares multiple surgical approaches, identifies contraindications and risk factors specific to the patient, anticipates procedure-specific complications, and generates pre-operative documentation. This skill helps you systematically work through cases with anatomical complexity, prior surgery, revision needs, or elevated surgical risk where multiple viable pathways exist.
Features
Organizes patient history, imaging findings, biomechanics, and comorbidities into a structured assessment framework
Evaluates multiple technique options (e.g., Lapidus vs. Austin vs. Scarf for HAV) with pros/cons for your specific case
Identifies diabetes, vascular disease, smoking, age, arthritis, neurovascular compromise, and other factors affecting surgical planning
Generates procedure-specific and patient-specific complication lists with prevention strategies
Flags anatomical, medical, and behavioral factors that may require technique modification or patient counseling
Structures pre-operative notes capturing clinical reasoning, surgical selection rationale, and risk mitigation plans
Generates clear written explanations of planned procedure, expected recovery, and realistic outcome ranges
Analyzes prior operative reports and outcomes to inform new surgical approach selection
Example Output
Example 1: Complex Bunionectomy Case
Patient: 68-year-old with severe HAV (IMA 18°, HVA 35°), prior failed scarf osteotomy, Type 2 diabetes, PAD history
Surgical Approach Comparison:
- Lapidus arthrodesis: Corrects high IMA, but patient's diabetes increases fusion non-union risk. Requires longer immobilization (8-12 wks). Consider.
- Scarf revision: Prior scarf malunion visible on imaging. High re-recurrence risk with same technique.
- Austin osteotomy: Insufficient for IMA >17°. Not recommended for this case.
Patient-Specific Risks: Diabetes (impaired healing), PAD (monitor perfusion), prior surgery (adhesions expected)
Complication Prevention Plan: Extended immobilization support, aggressive glucose management coordination, intraoperative perfusion assessment
Example 2: Flatfoot Reconstruction Decisions
Patient: 52-year-old with rigid flatfoot, moderate ankle arthritis, chronic posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
Recommended Approach: Double arthrodesis (TC + CC) rather than triple given preserved ankle ROM. Rationale documented with anatomical reasoning.
Complication Anticipation: Midfoot stiffness (expected), sural nerve risk (surgical approach planning), hardware irritation (implant selection noted)
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file with use-case triggers and skill overview:
- Surgical case analysis template: Structured sections for patient demographics, imaging interpretation, biomechanical assessment, and surgical decision matrix
- Approach comparison framework: Side-by-side technique evaluation (indications, contraindications, outcomes for each option)
- Risk stratification checklist: Comorbidity screening, anatomical complexity scoring, and patient-specific risk modification strategies
- Complication prevention protocol: Procedure-specific and diabetes/vascular/age-related risk mitigation steps with documentation points
- Pre-operative summary template: Clinical reasoning documentation ready for chart integration or patient discussion
Who It's For
- Podiatric surgeons — Planning complex foot and ankle cases with multiple viable surgical pathways
- Surgical residents/fellows — Structuring case analysis and building decision-making frameworks under supervision
- Foot and ankle specialists — Managing revision cases, high-risk patients, or anatomically challenging presentations
- Surgical case managers — Coordinating pre-operative risk assessment and comorbidity optimization before elective foot surgery
- Podiatric surgical centers — Standardizing pre-operative documentation and complication prevention protocols across cases
Best For
- Bunionectomy approach selection (Lapidus vs. osteotomy vs. arthrodesis decisions)
- Flatfoot reconstruction planning (arthrodesis level and technique selection)
- Revision foot and ankle surgery (analyzing prior failures and new approach selection)
- High-risk surgical patient assessment (diabetes, vascular disease, age-related comorbidities)
- Complication prevention documentation (patient-specific risk mitigation and informed consent)
- Anatomically complex cases (severe deformity, limited ROM, neurovascular variant anatomy)
- Multi-technique case comparison and surgical decision documentation
You might also like
You can develop comprehensive differential diagnoses by anchoring on the chief complaint, applying systematic reasoning to competing diagnoses, and identifying red flags that suggest serious pathology. The skill helps you organize complex clinical information, prioritize diagnostic possibilities based on prevalence and risk, and document your reasoning for medicolegal protection and clinical clarity.
by gptomics
You can rapidly analyze multifaceted surgical presentations—including revision cases, comorbidities, and combined pathology—to develop defensible pre-operative plans and detailed operative notes. The skill synthesizes clinical findings with imaging data, stratifies surgical risk, selects technique-specific approaches, and produces documentation that withstands peer review and quality audits.
by gptomics
You can systematically generate ranked differential diagnoses for presenting complaints (chest pain, dyspnea, abdominal pain, headache, joint pain, fatigue) by applying evidence-based clinical decision rules and risk stratification. The skill helps you identify red flags that change management priority, justify test selection to supervising physicians, and document diagnostic reasoning in the medical record while reducing anchoring bias and ensuring comprehensive consideration of serious diagnoses.
by gptomics
You conduct comprehensive pre-operative risk stratification using ASA classification, Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), and procedure-specific risk tools to quantify operative risk across physiologic systems. You systematically identify modifiable risk factors—anemia, hypertension, glucose dyscontrol, cardiac dysfunction—and implement targeted optimization protocols to reduce preventable complications. You generate objective, evidence-backed assessments that strengthen informed consent discussions, support case selection decisions, and create defensible documentation for shared decision-making with patients and surgical teams.
by gptomics
You'll systematically evaluate patient risk factors, stratify perioperative risk using evidence-based frameworks, and generate detailed anesthesia plans that address specific comorbidities and procedural requirements. This skill helps you synthesize complex patient data—medical history, physical exam findings, lab work, imaging, and medication profiles—into actionable risk mitigation strategies that optimize patient safety and guide technique selection, drug choices, and monitoring protocols.
by gptomics
You synthesize current clinical evidence into structured protocols tailored to your specialty and institutional context. This skill helps you build physician-nurse collaborative decision frameworks, identify implementation barriers before rollout, and create adoption guides that account for resource constraints and stakeholder buy-in. You'll develop protocols ready for medical staff committees and bedside teams—not generic templates, but specialty-specific standards that bridge research and practice.
by gptomics
You construct methodical differential diagnoses using a validated three-tier framework that separates don't-miss conditions from high-probability and lower-probability diagnoses. Claude integrates patient context, vital data, and epidemiologic patterns specific to primary care settings to generate actionable diagnostic branches with targeted next steps for confirmation or exclusion of each condition.
by gptomics
You can rapidly synthesize invasive hemodynamic monitoring, echocardiography, and lab data into coherent clinical assessments that guide inotrope and vasopressor selection specific to cardiac pathology. The skill helps you differentiate between pump dysfunction, volume status, and vasomotor tone problems to anticipate hemodynamic challenges at critical surgical transitions—from pre-bypass optimization through post-bypass weaning—and generate evidence-based pharmacologic reasoning suitable for documentation and peer review.
by gptomics