Acute Coronary Syndrome Risk Stratification for Cardiology
Stratify ACS risk using HEART, TIMI, GRACE scores for ED decision-making
What You Can Do
You can systematically evaluate chest pain presentations using evidence-based clinical decision tools (HEART, TIMI, GRACE scores) to categorize patients into risk strata, optimize diagnostic testing sequencing, and guide admission and treatment intensity decisions. This skill helps you reduce unnecessary hospitalizations while ensuring high-risk patients receive timely invasive evaluation and acute therapy.
Features
Rapidly evaluates History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin to identify low-risk chest pain patients safe for early discharge
Quantifies short-term (14-day) mortality and ischemic event risk using 7 clinical variables to guide therapeutic intensity
Predicts in-hospital and 6-month mortality risk in confirmed ACS to inform prognosis and intensity of secondary prevention
Systematically applies troponin-negative algorithms and serial biomarker interpretation for safe disposition decisions
Recommends appropriate testing intensity (serial troponin, advanced imaging, stress testing) based on risk stratification results
Clarifies observation unit vs. hospital admission vs. early discharge criteria using validated thresholds
Links risk strata to antiplatelet and anticoagulation dosing and revascularization urgency recommendations
Example Output
Example 1: Low-Risk Chest Pain
- 52-year-old with atypical chest discomfort, normal ECG, negative initial troponin
- HEART Score: 3 (Low Risk)
- Recommendation: Serial troponin at 3 hours; if negative, safe for observation unit or discharge with stress testing within 72 hours; single-dose aspirin; avoid admission
Example 2: Intermediate-Risk ACS
- 68-year-old with typical chest pain, ST depression on ECG, elevated troponin I (0.15)
- TIMI Score: 4 (Intermediate Risk)
- GRACE Score: 125 (Intermediate Mortality Risk)
- Recommendation: Admit to monitored bed; dual antiplatelet therapy + anticoagulation; early invasive strategy (angiography within 24 hours); intensive monitoring
Example 3: High-Risk NSTEMI
- 75-year-old with sustained chest pain, dynamic ST changes, markedly elevated troponin (2.4), prior MI
- GRACE Score: 165 (High Mortality Risk)
- Recommendation: Urgent admission; intensive dual antiplatelet therapy + anticoagulation; expedited angiography (within 2-4 hours); consider mechanical support evaluation
What's Included
- SKILL.md instruction file: Complete clinical algorithm and risk stratification workflows
- HEART Score Calculator Template: Structured worksheet for rapid point-of-care assessment
- Risk Stratification Checklist: Diagnostic and therapeutic decision pathway by risk tier (low/intermediate/high)
- Biomarker Interpretation Guide: Serial troponin algorithms and rule-out ACS protocols
- Therapeutic Intensity Matrix: Evidence-based medication dosing and revascularization timing by risk category
Who It's For
- Emergency Medicine Physicians — Chest pain evaluation and ED disposition decisions
- Cardiologists — Risk assessment in acute coronary care and prognostication
- Hospitalists — Acute care decision-making for admitted chest pain patients
- Nurse Practitioners/Physician Assistants — Chest pain protocols in emergency and acute settings
- Clinical Pharmacists — Antiplatelet and anticoagulation intensity titration based on risk strata
Best For
- Emergency department chest pain evaluation and rule-out ACS protocols
- Triage decisions between observation unit, inpatient admission, and early discharge
- Serial risk reassessment during the first 3–6 hours of presentation
- Matching diagnostic testing intensity (troponin frequency, imaging, stress testing) to risk level
- Guiding therapeutic decisions (dual antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation dosing, revascularization urgency)
You might also like
You can develop comprehensive differential diagnoses by anchoring on the chief complaint, applying systematic reasoning to competing diagnoses, and identifying red flags that suggest serious pathology. The skill helps you organize complex clinical information, prioritize diagnostic possibilities based on prevalence and risk, and document your reasoning for medicolegal protection and clinical clarity.
by gptomics
You can generate complete psychosocial assessment documents that synthesize biographical information, presenting problems, mental health symptoms, social support systems, and environmental stressors into a coherent clinical narrative. The skill structures assessments to meet insurance reimbursement requirements, legal documentation standards, and clinical utility for interdisciplinary treatment planning. Each assessment incorporates the social work perspective of person-in-environment analysis, ensuring clinical decisions account for social, economic, cultural, and relational factors.
by gptomics
You'll systematically evaluate patient risk factors, stratify perioperative risk using evidence-based frameworks, and generate detailed anesthesia plans that address specific comorbidities and procedural requirements. This skill helps you synthesize complex patient data—medical history, physical exam findings, lab work, imaging, and medication profiles—into actionable risk mitigation strategies that optimize patient safety and guide technique selection, drug choices, and monitoring protocols.
by gptomics
You synthesize current clinical evidence into structured protocols tailored to your specialty and institutional context. This skill helps you build physician-nurse collaborative decision frameworks, identify implementation barriers before rollout, and create adoption guides that account for resource constraints and stakeholder buy-in. You'll develop protocols ready for medical staff committees and bedside teams—not generic templates, but specialty-specific standards that bridge research and practice.
by gptomics
You construct methodical differential diagnoses using a validated three-tier framework that separates don't-miss conditions from high-probability and lower-probability diagnoses. Claude integrates patient context, vital data, and epidemiologic patterns specific to primary care settings to generate actionable diagnostic branches with targeted next steps for confirmation or exclusion of each condition.
by gptomics
You systematically assess diabetic foot ulcer risk using three standardized classification frameworks, document clinical findings in formats that satisfy medical-legal review and insurance authorization requirements, and identify modifiable risk factors to create targeted prevention and treatment strategies. This skill transforms routine foot exams into structured, defensible documentation that reduces liability exposure, improves patient compliance, and justifies clinical interventions to payers.
by gptomics
You can rapidly generate organized differential diagnoses for undifferentiated presentations (chest pain, dyspnea, altered mental status, abdominal pain) while catching cognitive biases like anchoring and premature closure. The framework helps you articulate defensible clinical reasoning, prioritize high-acuity diagnoses, and organize your thinking during time-pressured encounters with incomplete information.
by gptomics
You can rapidly synthesize invasive hemodynamic monitoring, echocardiography, and lab data into coherent clinical assessments that guide inotrope and vasopressor selection specific to cardiac pathology. The skill helps you differentiate between pump dysfunction, volume status, and vasomotor tone problems to anticipate hemodynamic challenges at critical surgical transitions—from pre-bypass optimization through post-bypass weaning—and generate evidence-based pharmacologic reasoning suitable for documentation and peer review.
by gptomics